Category Archives: ROS1

Shared: an amazing tale of survival

As a follow up to Craig’s very informative post about ROS1 mutations, I have asked my friend Mateo for permission to reprint his sister Sara’s experience. Mateo, like Craig, is someone I met thru the online lung cancer support group at INSPIRE. The lung cancer support group is a place where anyone (participants come from around the globe) touched by this awful disease can post a question, requests for prayers, or just share whatever is on their mind. Without fail, other members will respond with compassion, caring and an amazing wealth of information drawn from hard won personal experience. Mateo’s story:

A Hopeful Message

I wanted to share with those lung cancer sufferers and their loved ones this update on my sister Sara. It’s a very hopeful message.

About six months ago, I joined the online INSPIRE community. My sister Sara (age 48 and mother of two boys, ages 11 and 7) had just been diagnosed with stage IV adenocarcinoma, characterized by malignant pleural effusion. My first message was titled “Cancer Strikes My family: We Never Saw It Coming.” I was immediately showered with compassion by everyone there (Judy, MichiganLynn, DKHarris, Tina-1962). And I was educated.

The INSPIRE message board enabled us (myself and three other siblings) to identify the key words necessary to understand Sara’s condition. Very quickly we learned which questions to ask the doctors. “IntheAir” reached out right away and gave me hope (we’ve exchanged a hundred emails since then), and “CraiginPA” was very instrumental in encouraging us to have Sara’s initial biopsy retested at Mass General Hospital, which we did (her initial biopsy had come back negative for all mutations). Sure enough, Dr. Alice Shaw’s team discovered markers for ROS1. Sara had already endured 3 rounds of carboplatin/alimta by then, and she was not doing well at all. We believed her to be nearing the end. I wrote to Dr. Shaw and pleaded for Sara’s appointment to be moved up a week, and she kindly consented. Sara’s body was in bad shape: all of her counts and levels were way off. Many things weren’t working. Dr. Shaw’s team worked on her for several days around the clock and got her strong enough to enroll her in her clinical trial for crizotinib. I have to emphasize that this was no small feat.

At the time, Sara had two small (4 mm and 2 mm) brain metasteses. She was set for proton therapy, but that procedure was delayed as Dr. Shaw wanted to try to stabilize the lung cancer first. The cancer had spread to her other lung and a spot on her liver was also detected. Sara’s pleural effusion was a steady 1100 cc per day (it had gone down after the first round of chemotherapy, but it began climbing, much to our despair, between rounds 2 and 3). Dr. Shaw put her on crizotinib about 12 weeks ago. The impact was almost immediate. Sara’s acute pain was gone in less than 48 hours. Steadily, her pleural fluid diminished, and with it, her cough. It took about a month for the fluid to stop altogether. She had been on 4 liters/hour of supplemental oxygen and she required less and less. She regained her appetite and started putting on the weight she’d lost. After one cycle (28 days of crizotinib at 250 mg twice a day) she had shown an amazing response. Her side effects were almost nil: some ankle swelling, which she controlled by elevating and wearing compression socks, and some of those visual effects (brief shadowing images when the lighting shifted suddenly).

But this story gets better. After two cycles, she was scanned. The pleural rind covering her lung was resolved; she would not need decortication followed by talc pleurodesis. In fact, she had her pleurex catheter removed a month ago. Her lung is now able to expand more and more. She’s completely off of oxygen and walking up to four miles a day. Her liver function (indicated by albumin level) is 100% back to normal. The larger of her brain mets has shrunk to the point where doctors no longer deem radiation necessary, and the smaller one has completely disappeared, indicating, perhaps, that crizotinib crosses the blood-brain barrier.

She has her life back. She’s hauling her kids to ball games and getting back to work. Her house is her castle again. She’s cooking and gardening and entertaining family and friends. She’s overjoyed to be mothering her boys again and will resume yoga classes again this week.

Of course, we are very concerned about drug resistance and we continue to monitor reports on second-line drugs and immunotherapies. Dr. Shaw has since identified Sara’s fusion partner (ROS1 gene has fused with CD74 of chromosome 6, i believe), and she and her team have created a cell line so that they can try to learn through chemosensitive tests which second line drugs are likely to work for Sara if or when the time comes.

If I may . . . Sara’s case exemplifies why people in the know constantly urge people to go in for further testing. As more and more mutations are discovered, there are more options besides standard of care; better options in many cases. Were someone I know to be stricken with NSCLC, I would recommend watching webinars of the latest findings. For example, a site like this one, which features a number of recent short lectures by some of the world’s leading lung cancer researchers, including dr. Alice Shaw:

I am grateful to everyone who has shared advice and extended sympathy to me and my family. I will continue to study the new findings coming out and to share any information that comes my way.


A new mutation on the block: ROS1

There is a newly identified oncogenic mutation in NSCLC, ROS1. Although present in but a small percentage of patients, its discovery represents an additional breakthrough in understanding what ‘drives’ individual cancers. Better yet, crizotinib (Xalkori) would appear to be a potent inhibitor of ROS1.

My friend Craig, who, if he wasn’t so busy being a lung cancer patient would make a fine medical researcher, has the ROS1 mutation and is a veritable encyclopedia of knowledge on all things ROS1. Craig has made it his mission to educate as many people as possible on the importance of being tested for ROS1 in the absence of other identifiable mutations, with numerous postings on both INSPIRE and GRACE. I asked Craig if he would be willing to recant his experience yet again, and he has obliged with an information filled guest blog. Should you have any questions about ROS1, I am certain Craig would be happy to respond.


“The first mutation-targeted miracle drug Linnea successfully used was Xalkori (crizotinib). Crizotinib was remarkable because it was a designer drug, not just a discovery, originally designed to inhibit a lung cancer “driving mutation” called c-MET, but it soon became apparent that it worked dramatically well for ALK-driven cancer. Well, back in January 2012 research was finally published by my favorite superdoc Dr. Alice Shaw and her colleagues at MGH showing that crizotinib seemed to have a similarly dramatic effect on ROS1-driven cancer, a mutation that occurs in about 1% or so of non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC) vs. about 4% for ALK.

I want to bring you up to speed on this second breakthrough discovery about Xalkori (crizotinib). That January article ( described pre-clinical laboratory research and a dramatic near-complete response in one patient. That work was from last year and in the meanwhile Pfizer’s phase 1 trial of crizotinib for ALK was expanded to add patients with cancer driven by ROS1.

By April 2012 fourteen ROS1 patients were enrolled in that trial and Dr. Shaw presented some data results for them at the ASCO conference early this month. (That ASCO conference is the big annual 5-day event for over 30,000 oncologists and cancer experts where they showcase their research in presentations, educational sessions, and a science fair-like exhibition hall with about 500 exhibitor experiment posters at a time that change each morning and evening.)

As you can see in the graph shown in the article at , the responses of the patients to crizotinib was pretty dramatic. In fact, every ROS1 patient had some benefit from the drug, not counting one patient whose test result was ambiguous and probably didn’t really have the ROS1 rearrangement mutation, and one who had to drop out early due to a bowel problem but later had 60% shrinkage from crizotinib. A drug that benefits 100% of patients (including me) is truly remarkable in oncology research. We’ll have to wait to find more of those rare ROS1 patients before we can know if this success rate will hold up and before we’ll know if the duration of benefit is similar to that for ALK or longer.

What is ROS1? It’s a gene that makes a receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) type of protein which sits on the surface of a cell like a hairpin with the points stuck through to the inside. When certain chemicals come in contact with it this RTK, those points come together and align certain chemicals together inside the cells so they can react and become activated (energized or phosphorylated). That, in turn, begins a cascade of reactions that cause cell behaviors like growth and stubborn survival. In the case of a cancer-causing ROS1 rearrangement, the RTK is misshaped so that it runs amuck, locked into an “on” position that activates chemicals continually whenever they come near.

Fortunately, the normal ROS1 gene isn’t used much in adults, so it isn’t very harmful to try to shut it down when it runs amuck. Even though the ROS1 and ALK genes are located on different chromosomes, they are similar and the RTKs they create fold into a similar molecular shape. That is why crizotinib can inhibit both of them similarly. But they are a little different, and we don’t yet know if the differences will confirm greater odds of benefit from crizotinib, differences in shrinkage, duration, or mechanisms of resistance, or which 2nd generation drugs would work best or longest, but it does seem like they might be similar or analogous.

The first challenge for this research is finding enough ROS1 patients for the clinical trials and research, not just in lung cancer but possibly in other cancers. At about 1% or so of NSCLC, you have to pick through tons of proverbial hay to find those needles. But the odds of ROS1 improve a lot once testing has ruled out the more common driving mutations EGFR, ALK, and KRAS, especially in never-smoker adenocarcinoma. So if you know someone with NSCLC, probably adenocarcinoma in particular, who claims to not have any of the mutations, have them ask their oncologist about ROS1 testing.

I believe knowing the driving mutation of one’s cancer is very valuable. Even if there’s no drug for it yet, there could be a new discovery tomorrow morning. That’s how I felt when I asked my local oncologist where I could get further testing beyond the common ones. He recommended Dr. Shaw 250 miles away in Boston. Until then, the prospects for my kind of cancer seemed grim; I was expected to live only a couple of years or so if nothing worked, and that felt likely. But Dr. Shaw guessed I might have ROS1 and confirmed it with the reliable FISH test for ROS1. With her trial already underway, crizotinib was just waiting for me to show up. My cancer symptoms pretty much vanished within a day or so of starting the trial, my cancer shrank and became a lot less dense, the side effects have been minimal, and it’s been smooth sailing for several months so far. To other NSCLC patients who don’t have any of the more common driving mutations, I hope they will follow my example to find out if there might be a miracle drug waiting for them in Boston, too.”

Craig in PA
June 2012